Archive for April, 2013


I’m not into detail of explaining my reverse engineering but I have some idea behind it. Mostly because of VSG (Viktor Stepanovich Grebennikov):

  • Using simplest form of construction which I need to think around 80’s what the common ‘cheap’ item to use and what possible material might work.
  • Possible generator or power supply that he use to activate his flying platform.
  • The wood plate that he uses is too thin to put most of known method of propulsion/flying.
  • Controlling method that been published, the Chinese Fan Blade, underneath his flying platform was not possible due to strict space underneath the wooden platform and funny angle that he show from his drawings.
  • The material that he use, of the famous blade, the design and other entity inside the box that attach the pole mostly questionable if we dig out from his book.

So my idea is consist of given point above, and I try to explain as we go along this publishment.

Mid 80’s construction.

I agreed that the wooden box was actually from, roughly rigid, old soviet microscope box with a dimension of 1’ x 2’ x 2”. And the thickness of each wood will be around ½” average.

My reverse engineering, wooden box was 8” x 16” x 1 ½” with thickness of 1/3” average. So my wooden platform was 4” smaller (from every angle) from original VSG flying plate. And this wooden plate was an electrical meter board, that in Malaysia, most likely around 80’s and 90’s still use for their electrical penal box. Nowadays, Malaysia board is using thin enclose metal box (sometime with lock) for better grounding and terminal protection.

two DSCF2850

The possible generator/power supply.

This is kind of tricky, because I need to take this idea into consideration first. Remember in 2nd July 2005, Stan Deyo giving some compelling fact (in his Ancient of Days #3) about UFO’s and antigravity. He did tell us about a story in late 50’s a guy in the air force did find antigravity. Below is some of his story.

“A navigator tells a story after handover a seal envelope to his friend a pilot, which inside envelope consists of the drawings and sketch of his antigravity experiment. In the drawing shows of three level of particle board, some washer, rod, and hook up to a frequency generator. When switch on – nothing happen.

But all of the sudden it lift off, and he amaze, the air underneath become a kind of grey jelly like. And then, he grabs a broom stick and start to play with the field. Afterward when he try to shut it down by disconnect the switch.

Unfortunately the circuit can’t shut down and continue on (with electric arc connected the circuit) until he use the same broom stick to check the field to smash the floating particle board and some huge electrical discharge going up and blast the nearby power transformer in the block.”

The other version that I read, just a few months ago, I found out that the person he refer (or the story kind of similar) and this person had a patent about his finding. And this person story as below.

“In 1967, he got some idea on figure out how Flying Saucer works, and he built a device and tests it in his garage. He built a small unit that can produce 150,000 Volt, thrown by the force field, create a loud bang, and blow his TV, his radio and a power transformer 150 pole from his resident.

And then he was call out on a business (maybe to be a navigator which continue on to Stan Deyo story), and when he gets back the squirrel was to blame (by the electric company) for the blown of the power transformer. The electric company fixes his TV and his radio because of the squirrel reason.

A few weeks later he achieve 500,000 volt with that device and all TV and radio around the neighborhood reported blinking and he goes around fixing the problems.”

Sound familiar? Coincident?  If only this was the same person, or the same event when been tell with different person, with 10 years off between the two insident date. This guy did explain the same story as Stan Deyo told based on a navigator story.

The good thing is this guy (he who not be named) did granted a US patent in 1978. After studies his patent, I think I know how his antigravity works and how this VSG antigravity platform should be work with the same princpal.

Too thin to put a rocket engine.

I try to fit anything to a wooden plate with thickness of 1 and a half inch, not possible. Even if I put high voltage coil, any controlling mechanism and even a stand of open close Chinese Fan small hinge also not successful, so I need to think of something out of the box, not in normal realm of standard physics.

The Chinese Fan – not an actual open and collapse fan.

After seeing VSG underneath picture, I conclude, for my personal reverse engineering, this was not a Chinese fan but rather a louver. The blind is not open and close in a single pole at all. But this blind is open and close (without collapsing) by each blind tilting from zero degree to 45 degree (maximum) in louver hinge like mechanism.

By making this blind (in zero degree) near the wooden box surface, the intensities of the rushing waves from upper atmosphere rushing through VSG and pushing the ground was high. And by tilting some of the blind up to 45 degree, these intensities of the rushing field will be gradually low and he began to land.

The left turn and right turn mechanism also depends on VSG controlling intensities of coordinated blind underneath his wooden platform.

right left turn

Still next to the question, I agree VSG using 4 point geometric pattern underneath his platform but where in the world he get this kind of pattern (in nature) anyway.

I know most probably, some of us did buy or use a powerful microscope, kill enough bug to check and understand how they fly by VSG CSE principal.

Well, VSG did tell the principal (in fragment) inside his book, and I think most of us just tend to ignore it.

Inside VSG book.

I did discuss with Francesco (my friend from Italy) about the c-shaped capacitor that may have some resemble to the picture in VSG book like:

  • His underneath plate (I highlight one of its plate)

NOT CENTER

  • His picture of ground bee (I highlight the c-shape cavity that VSG referring to)

honey bee

I think that both of this drawings shows that VSG using c-shape capacitor in his flying platform

As shown as below

image3151

His controlling method

I already notice that VSG have 4 perpendicular point of blade underneath his flying plate and can be notice in blow up picture below.

As shown as below

pol23-2

Now this design will be seen in my prototype below

  • The original design

theree DSCF2855

  • This will be the overall arrangement & design inside the wooden platform

fourDSCF2854

  • The complete arrangement (based on my reverse engineering terminology) would looks like.

two DSCF2850

Although these reverse engineering still not finish, but the construction wise currently at 20%.

More to be completed soon and will publish more in future.

I think most of my fellow reader will ask, if this guy know so much about human physiology and how the brain function, let alone a lot of publishment about how to increase brain function, if we are born dumb, sorry to say that out loud, did not include TCDS in his review.

Well, I was getting to but, TCDS if compare with other type of brain function pill review was relatively new to the world, even this technology was develop around early 1900, it was use for crazy person, not to increase intellectual of a normal person.

So I personally getting some time to review it personally, from reading, developing the devices and then, make myself as human test subject expose to that device.

After 4 month later, because I started to test it from around end of December 2012, I’m now ready to share this information to the world.

For quick introduction, TCDS or Trans-Cranial Direct-Current Stimulation was a device, using low voltage electric current, around 1.25volt or less, and have output of less than 1 miliampere of direct current stimulate on skin surface of our head.

Take it as acupuncture for brain, using low current and voltage DC electric as extra stimulation, to stimulate brain, or massage the brain, to get what you want like, extra memory function, extra processing power, extra of what brain would do, which it normally doesn’t.

I did test it, in crude form, and I use postman rubber band, (the big one) to put around my head and use the probe, to stimulate my brain.

My favorite ‘acupuncture’ point at my head is T3 (cathode) and T4 (Anode) for savant learning and FP2 (cathode) and FP1 (anode) for extra memory. Well, at first I thought it was my belief that this thing work. But later, after each session of 25 minutes, I feel that this thing not just increasing my productivity but continue on giving me extra perception of idea.

Most of ‘savant learning’ does is detailing up each task into much higher accuracy which I could not achieve without it.

For extra memory, it does help, but because I use 1mA of current, that was too high, I cannot use it for long.

The probe that I use , more towards ‘direct-probe’ which will directly touch my skin with its multiple point of metal blunt needle, it’s not hurting me but as I use high current of 1mA, this probe did burn my skin after 25 minutes of use.

I think, direct probe did burn my skin in many occasion, so alternatively, I use wet kitchen tissue, split it in half for each probe, as pad, in between the probe and my skin. Only by that way, my skin is not burn and I can use it for longer period of time, let say, during my work task.

Because this device that I made is in its infancies, most of my colleague, my managers, and my bosses, did notice this device, all the wires gone to my head, the headband, while I trying to complete my task in front of my laptop, and they can’t help to ask “what is that thing at your head?”.

Then, I was just ended up explaining to them about TCDS, what this device capable and good for, and amongst other thing, I need to explain that I’ve been into this research almost 4 month and now is the phase of testing on human subject.

Most of them reply, very interesting and need to know the result soon. And some of them just say, be careful, all the wires and electrical circuit seems like dangerous.

During my test, I did encounter some minor spasm, more like contraction on the back or side neck if I move my head after more than 15 minutes into this stimulation. And after complete session of 25 minutes, I did notice that the effect can continue on for almost 4 to 6 hours afterward. And this means, only 25 minutes of wire and all, and near full days of memory or savant learning effect.

The downside of this device is, because of no current controlled knob, I use exposure duration as my limit of stimulation, means, the more current I need, the longer the session are, and the less current I need, the shorter duration of the session are.

And other additional thing that I encounter is, what should I call it anyway, ‘a flip-flop after effect’ on decision, as example, after each session, I take a chocolate bar out of the fridge, unwrap it, and I should throw away the wrap into dustbin, instead I throw away the wrap, I did throw away the chocolate into the dustbin. This only occur if I continue to think about a task (during my session) while doing other new task (without focus on the new task) and do it twice as fast from normal without TCDS interference. Means, if it’s a new task, I do it in normal speed, and focus on the new task rather than the old one, this problem will not happen at all.

I also think that, if let say we use ‘memory’ stimulation, after 25 minutes, I continue on ‘savant learning’ stimulation, TCDS was not helping to get both, it only helping to get on the current session only.

Previously I did think about make a multiple probe to my head, stimulate different section of my head, to make average or multi capability of my brain, now seems impossible task. I think, it was because, our brain use different section to different task, to activate overall to a specific task not heighted the brain power, means, TCDS, for certain task, only can use on certain probe location only.

So for this infancy review, I can conclude:

  • To hide the device into smaller device and the probe to be installed on a normal design baseball cap, so while using it, nobody will notice that I actually increase my brain power.
  • Seems the idea of lowering the ampere from 1mA is a good idea and can use it longer stimulation session, so maybe putting a knob is not a bad idea after all.
  • And this knob idea also reduces spasm that I encounter with 1mA, or each time I turn my neck. (this neck spasm thing just occur in first 15 minutes of each session ended, not a permanent thing)
  • Multiple probes so far is a bad idea, but I did read a development of High Definition Probe to exactly specify region point of each task, even it was still in a specific task, for now, just stick with one task only as solution to each problem.

One thing I can share for this publishment is, if I use savant learning session to complete my task, during completing that task I explore until minor detail available to get things right, once complete that task and that session, if anyone ask me about how I did complete the task? Well, the answer will be too detail until all of my managers and bosses just skip ahead and say, well you know what you’d doing, and I hope you can explain all of this to others that understand what you talking about.

In that case, I can conclude, TCDS did help me completing a complex task, and at the same time, make other that yourself impress on the level of detail that you know to complete it.

I leave a link of TCDS research from all over the world, in means of ‘savant learning’ that I did mention throughout this blog.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toXXedmCyEE

Thanks.